In my last post, I proposed that many of the social benefits that our system once provided are now easily had without membership in a fraternity. Furthermore, our organizational overhead (all that reporting and accountability and service and ritual and etc. etc. etc.) make us a bad deal if the object of membership is just to have a place to pal around with your buds or bros.
I believe that chapters that are remaining large or experiencing growth today are taking one of two paths:
The first is to emphasize the party aspects of membership while trying to minimize the organizational obligations. This is the natural evolution of our de facto strategy for the last few decades–providing that social network. Only now, what is left that must be provided face to face when we can do so many things electronically? Well, parties and similar, usually alcohol centered, social activities. Alcohol is an essential part of the mix because it’s prohibited for most undergrads and, therefore, desirable and, it’s no fun sitting at home alone doing shots. Alcohol consumption is a social activity for most people and you have to be where the drug is. Furthermore, if you can get enough friends together, you can economize on its purchase. A fraternity can provide a ready pool of manpower and money for organizing alcohol events and an invite list for reaching a critical mass of participation that makes it social and economical. And, if the event is going well, you get to look around and feel that you are part of something successful because you have pulled off the event. There’s a little sense of belonging payoff there.
Starting the next day or at the next meeting, you can bond by telling stories about your conduct, and that of others, that would normally be embarrassing. But, in this context, these shared embarrassments and the trust implicit in being able to share them, are what create the brotherhood. The more embarrassing the revelations–throwing up on yourself, hitting on the ugliest girl at the party, wetting the bed (with your date in it is even better), kicking in the door, waking up in the yard–the greater the trust and the stronger the bond becomes.
In such an organization, all the other things a fraternity should do, the things that make us a special organization rather than a group of guys that organize for social occasions, are unwanted add-ons that members do only so they can continue to operate with some kind of recognition on campus or in their national organization.
What’s strange is that they’d really be better off giving up the franchise and all the obligations that come with that. But they don’t because those letters are associated in their minds with those good times they are having and those friendships they are creating. It’s an attachment that can frequently bring forth sincere tears when they talk about their “love of the fraternity”. It’s not the fraternity they are loving though. It’s the emotional outcome of their experiences. That’s the fraternity to them.
This was the value added by the Greek system for decades and, that we are here today to think about what to do next, indicates that IT WAS SUCCESSFUL for most of that time. But that success depended on our society’s turning a blind eye to some things: alcohol and drug abuse, property damage, trashy yards, unsafe housing, lackluster academic performance, being a nuisance to the neighbors, etc.
Because our operating environment has changed, the old model now comes with a lot of liability. Sooner rather than later, such an organization will create a situation that it cannot handle and will require adult intervention to keep operating. And, these days, that intervention is getting harder to find because, frankly, most adults have better things to do with their time and most national operations can do without the bad publicity and the exposure.
Nevertheless, many organizations that follow the old model do manage to hang on because they do enough of the “good stuff” to demonstrate some value to the community or they have a set of alumni powerful and willing enough to shepherd the organization through periodic crises. These organizations tend either to be small and living in substandard, or no common, housing because they really are just circles of friends. Or they are older organizations that own properties suitable for hosting large social events. These chapters can maintain membership by attracting a lot of candidates who are interested in the kind of social experience those facilities can support.
Unfortunately, in both cases, getting the members to do the things that make the organization more than a drinking club for a group of friends is always an uphill battle. Left to their own devices, the undergrads would gladly give all that up and start planning the next beer pong tournament or band party–as long as they can keep those letters. And, as I mentioned earlier, they really don’t need to be a fraternity to do that and there aren’t many adults who are interested in “riding herd” on such a group. (Just look around.)
In the next post, I’ll write about the other path–changing the operational model and the recruiting pool.